The Nuremberg Trials Essay - 564 Words - StudyMode
It is worth noting here that while not discounting the fact that Saddam Hussein was a brutal dictator who was responsible for a number of atrocities, Iraqi citizens had the highest standard of living in the Middle East during his time in power. Some of the benefits enjoyed under the Hussein government for men and were free education kindergarten through graduate school and the provision of free health care services for every Iraqi citizen. Each is an impressive social benefit that not even the government of the richest nation on the planet – the United States – can lay claim to providing for its citizens. Was Iraq’s oil wealth used to fight wars, buy arms on the international market (including from the US) and allow Hussein and high-ranking Ba’ath Party officials to live lives of luxury? Yes. However, since the Hussein government has been removed, quality universal health care has declined to such an extent that at times it has become almost nonexistent. At the same time, the educational system in Iraq has suffered horrors that are frightening to consider. To be sure, more than 2700 public and private schools, kindergarten through graduate school, have been “damaged” (including, 84% of colleges and universities), destroyed, looted, have become too dangerous to attend (e.g., more than 500 professors have been assassinated) or simply closed. Creating the conditions that allow for the destruction of education within a society is the surest sign of moral decay. Yet, the above realities are regularly ignored by our political leaders ( the corporate press) who have created this war.
Law Essay on Nuremberg Trial ..
Lau Pak Khuan conferred Datuk Seri title by Malaysia Sultan leads unsuccessful bid for Chinese official language status during drafting of Malaysia Constitution
1995: Jury trials abolished
2001: Malaysia is a constitutional monarchy.
Using African slavery and the Nuremberg trials as examples, we have reviewed the debates surrounding conflicting influences of natural law and positive law, rejecting the rhetoric of both in favor of a pragmatic critique of social injustice. This pragmatic concern rejects metaphysical and positivist rationales and rests on the assumption that an inclusive concern for the well-being and equality of all people is preferable to any system in which individual interest (e.g., greed and selfishness) become the basis for the social, political, and legal orders. It encourages people to offer critiques of specific laws based on standards that offend their moral imaginations, and not on some abstract moral standard or legal principle. Fundamental to this task is for critics to use language that people can rally behind to enact pragmatic and imaginative visions of social justice.
Essay about The Trials at Nuremburg - 1271 Words | …
The importance of this article will scarcely be doubted by any persons, who haveduly reflected upon the subject. The militia is the natural defence of a freecountry against sudden foreign invasions, domestic insurrections, and domesticusurpations of power by rulers. It is against sound policy for a free people tokeep up large military establishments and standing armies in time of peace, bothfrom the enormous expenses, with which they are attended, and the facile means,which they afford to ambitious and unprincipled rulers, to subvert thegovernment, or trample upon the rights of the people. The right of the citizensto keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of theliberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against theusurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these aresuccessful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph overthem. And yet, though this truth would seem so clear, and the importance of awell regulated militia would seem so undeniable, it cannot be disguised, thatamong the American people there is a growing indifference to any system ofmilitia discipline, and a strong disposition, from a sense of its burthens, tobe rid of all regulations. How it is practicable to keep the people duly armedwithout some organization, it is difficult to see. There is certainly no smalldanger, that indifference may lead to disgust, and disgust to contempt; and thusgradually undermine all the protection intended by this clause of our nationalbill of rights.
Nuremberg Trials Martin Bormann Essays 1 - 30 Anti Essays
If, therefore, the present case turned upon the question, whether a state mightorganize, arm and discipline its own militia, in the absence of, or subordinateto, the regulations of congress, I am certainly not prepared to deny thelegitimacy of such an exercise of authority. It does not seem repugnant in itsnature to the grant of a like paramount authority to congress; and if not, thenit is retained by the states. The fifth [sic] amendment to the constitution,declaring that "a well-regulated militia being necessary to the security ofa free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not beinfringed," may not, perhaps, be thought to have any important bearing onthis point. If it have, it confirms and illustrates, rather than impugns, thereasoning already suggested.
Get access to Nuremberg Trials Martin Bormann Essays ..
As said by counsel for the appellant: "The freedom of thought, of speech,and of the press; the right to bear arms; exemption from military dictation;security of the person and of the home; the right to speedy and public trial byjury; protection against oppressive bail and cruel punishment,--are, togetherwith exemption from self-crimination, the essential and inseparable features ofEnglish liberty. Each one of these features had been involved in the struggleabove referred to in England within the century and a half immediately precedingthe adoption of the constitution, and the contests were fresh in the memoriesand traditions of the people at that time."